Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted in Articles by BCR | 0 comments

Vegetarianism

Vegetarianism

 

More than half of the water we use in this country goes toward livestock production, including the irrigation of feed crops and pasture grass, consumption by livestock, and waste disposal. Animal agriculture uses more water than all American cities and industries combined. It takes 2,500 to 6,000 gallons of water to produce one pound of meat, but only 25 gallons of water to grow one pound of wheat.

 

Livestock raising also consumes large amounts of grain. About 70% of the grains grown in this country (300 million tons) is fed not to Americans, nor the world’s starving masses, but to livestock and poultry. Very little of this food grain comes back to us in the form of meat. A chicken has to eat 5 pounds of protein to produce one pound of protein from chicken flesh. This is an 80% waste of food. The production of a pound of pork protein requires the consumption of seven and a half pounds of protein. To produce one pound of feedlot beef, a cow has to eat sixteen pounds of grain and soybeans resulting in a 94% waste of food.

 

It is livestock raising, more than all other human activities combined, that helps deplete topsoil, groundwater and energy resources, while ravaging forests, waterways, wildlife and habitat.

 

Doesn’t it make more sense for humans to eat that grain, which is healthier and more nutritious than meat, and to feed it to the world’s 800 million hungry people, than to waste so much of it on livestock?

 

Speaking of waste, did you know American agriculture produces an amount of animal waste that is 140 times greater than that which humans produce? That means five tons of manure, for every man woman and child in the country!

 

Most of the above was quoted from Losing Paradise, by Paul G. Irwin. This book is available in our secure on line gift shop for $20.00.

 

For a compelling CD contact www.GoVeg.com

 

 

 

The Truth About Milk and Your Health

 

 

Got milk? You’ve got problems

 

By Karen Dawn

 

The Los Angeles Times

 

August 13, 2005

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-dawn13aug13,0,4920117.story (requires free registration)

 

Dairy cows have overtaken automobiles as the No. 1 air polluter in parts of California according to a Los Angeles Times article. A New York Times editorial discussed “the eye-stinging, nose-burning smell of cattle congestion in rural California ,” acknowledging that something had to be done. What nobody wants to say, in this land of milk and cookies, is that we shouldn’t be drinking cow’s milk.

 

In the last edition of his “Baby and Child Care” bible, Dr. Benjamin Spock made it clear that cow’s milk is for baby cows, not for human children. He wrote that it was “too rich in the saturated fats that cause artery blockages” and that it “slows down iron absorption.” He suggested that it may cause ear and/or respiratory problems, and may be linked to childhood onset diabetes. He stressed that infants should drink only human breast milk and older children should try soy and rice milk products.

 

But the dairy industry would rather you didn’t know that. As it spends millions of dollars telling us that milk consumption will help us lose weight, it would rather we didn’t see a study published in the June issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. The study found that children who drink more than three servings of milk daily are prone to becoming overweight, even if it is low-fat milk. Neither does the industry advertise the Harvard School of Public Health finding that 15% of whites, 70% of African Americans and 90% of Asians are lactose intolerant.

 

The dairy industry prefers to scare us with tales of brittle bones, hoping we don’t notice studies showing that people in Asia, who consume almost no dairy products, have a significantly lower rate of hip fractures than people in “got milk?” America. Consistent with those results is Harvard University ‘s 1997 Nurses Health Study, which followed 78,000 women over a 12-year period and found that those who consumed the most dairy foods broke the most bones.

 

And a study published just this month in the International Journal of Cancer found a 13% increase in ovarian cancer risk in women who increased their lactose intake in amounts equivalent to one glass of milk per day.

 

Men don’t need milk either. A Harvard study published in 1998 linked high calcium consumption to prostate cancer, and in this week’s news, we learned that Dean Ornish’s low-fat, vegan diet (no dairy) may block the progression of that disease. While touting its products as a fundamental part of a healthy diet, the dairy industry won’t rush to tell us that Scott Jurek, who just won the Western States 100-mile run  for the seventh time in a row  is vegan.

 

Now, we learn that the dairy industry may also be harming our children by polluting the air. The Times article quoted an attorney for the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment, who said that in Fresno, in the center of the nation’s dairy industry, one in six children carries an inhaler to school.

 

Instead of protecting us, the government aligns itself with the dairy lobby. The California Milk Advisory Board, a government agency, playfully took advantage of society’s increasing concern for animal welfare with its phenomenally successful “happy cows” campaign, which shows extended bovine families grazing in meadows.

 

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sued the board for false advertising, arguing that most California dairy cows live miserable lives on overcrowded dirt lots. They are artificially inseminated annually, because they don’t produce milk without pregnancies, and are pumped full of hormones so that they will give 10 times as much milk as they would naturally. Their calves are carted off to veal crates. Then at about age 5, the “happy” cows are turned into hamburgers. PETA’s suit failed  on the grounds that government bodies are exempt from fair advertising laws. Government is free to say whatever it wants about the conditions in which cows live, or about the “health benefits” of milk.

 

Unfortunately, the government is unlikely to start running ads suggesting we follow Asia’s lead and switch to tofu, or even kale, though both have more calcium per cup than cow’s milk. But for your health, the environment, the animals, and for those kids in Fresno carrying inhalers, why not change your next Starbucks low-fat latte order to soy?

 

 

Add Comment Register



Post a Reply