U.K. zoos falling short in conservation efforts, report says

“Animal Ark or Sinking Ship?”

At least 5,624 species of vertebrate animals are currently threatened with extinction worldwide.

The role of zoos in the conservation of biodiversity, and specifically ex situ conservation, became a legal obligation in Europe in 2002 with the implementation of the European Zoos Directive. The Directive was fully incorporated into UK zoo legislation in 2003. Perhaps recognising an opportunity to refute growing scepticism over the keeping of animals in captivity, zoos assumed the role of animal `arks’ and promoted their new conservation purpose.

However, despite claims by zoos that their contribution to conservation is significant, to date there has been no reliable mechanism to assess zoos’ performance. Should the conservation credentials of zoos be taken on trust?

In the last 12 months, the Born Free Foundation has undertaken a series of investigations to assess the conservation commitment of the UK’s more ‘progressive’ zoos.
Download the report summary – pdf 815KB

Born Free’s investigation reveals some startling findings:

1. 91.1% of threatened mammal species are not represented in the Consortium of Charitable Zoos (CCZ) (‘the most progressive zoos in the country’).

2. Nearly 95% of threatened bird species are not represented in CCZ zoos.

3. The CCZ keeps only 11 of the 1,811 threatened species of amphibian (ie 0.6%).

4. The CCZ only keeps 3.5% of the total number of animal species (mammals, birds and amphibians) listed by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2006).

5. More than 60% of species kept by the CCZ are in the ‘Least Concern’ category (lowest IUCN Red List category).

6. Only 37% of CCZ animals are higher risk than Least Concern.

7. Only one third of animal species for which a captive breeding programme exists are kept by the CCZ.

8. One quarter of CCZ species included in European breeding programmes are classed as Least Concern.

9. At least 69% of the public believe zoos spend more on conservation in the wild than they actually do. The CCZ appears to spend an estimated 4–6.7% of gross income on conservation in the wild. The public believes zoos spend about four times that amount.

10. The public believes at least 41% of species kept in zoos are threatened in the wild. But less than 25% of CCZ species are threatened in the wild.

If this represents their commitment to conservation, are these zoos
really part of the broader conservation solution, or should the
limited financial resources and human effort be more effectively
applied directly to conservation of threatened species in their wild
habitat?

Full details can be found in our two reports:

Is the Ark Afloat? pdf – 278KB Captivity and ex situ conservation in
UK zoos.

Committed to Conservation? pdf – 193KB An overview of the Consortium of Charitable Zoos In Situ conservation dividend.

http://www.bornfree.org.uk/campaigns/ zoo-check/uk-zoos/zoo-
conservation/

How much did you like this?

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

You May Also Like

British Columbia: Neighbor wants tiger declared illegal

By Doug MarnerNews Leader Pictorial May 26 2007 A Siberian tiger in the Valley ...

The straight poop on counting tigers

The straight poop on counting tigers New study shows that fecal DNA sampling provides ...

Texas: Owner of seized big cats charged with animal cruelty

UPDATE: Owner of exotic animals behind barsPosted: Jan 28, 2010 7:33 PM EST Updated: ...